Didn't the Founding Fathers want Congress to be gridlocked?

The founder's father made a system that various sections of the government can see each other. But they expect the main competition of the government to be between these branches. They do not believe that the political system of the United States will or will not have political parties (although they started many political parties immediately after establishing this system). Today's system, the main competition coming from organized parties fighting in various government departments, is far from the system they imagine.

In some cases, the founder's father considered rules that would lead to more deadlocks. For example, some proposals are calling for overwhelming majority of people to take parliamentary actions. But they finally refused these ideas. Federal Prime Minister James Madison explains as follows. "In all cases where judicial or general interests may require the adoption of new laws or aggressive measures, the basic principles of free government will be reversed, the majority of which will be decided Right: power will be transferred to a few people. "

In other words, founding fathers are dying for a while, despite they are still alive, they still have many different opinions. Everyone who is confident in asserting that the founder's father knows how to deal with today's political problems is a liar. Alexander Hamilton may ask several questions about planes and African American presidents before commenting on Congressional efficiency.

Do not get me wrong. The founder's father does not want criminals and terrorists to maintain profits, and of course I do not. But they want a legitimate process, rule of law, proof and conviction. Just like Mexican police provide cash to transport tourists, they do not want to make us a banana republic, arbitrarily search, detain or destroy the police . They will do this because they live in an authoritarian state. They know exactly what it means. The UK Government may force you to place soldiers in your house and pay bills. They can not condemn people and appeal them in secret courts sometimes called Star Chambers. "Constitution" is designed to stop these abuses, but today they are embarrassed, because today's people are not alive, only free society does not know the meaning of life.

It is their business that the founder opposed or opposed it. The fact that they actually wrote in the Constitution is that "Congress should not make a law on the establishment of religion", the Constitution is not based on the personal faith belief that the founder founded, but based on our legal system There. Whenever you pray, do not become like hypocrites; they like to pray while standing in the corner and the synagogue so that others can see it. To tell the truth, they have already received rewards. But whenever you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your secret father; and the father you look secret will reward you. (Matthew 6: 5-6)

Let's see the government and the media concretely. If you want to see the government's stalemate from a historical point of view, please think that you opposed the thing called Harry Truman in 1948, which called 906 public law "Calling nothing (80) meeting." The 112th, 113th and 114th Parliamentary Merger (the last three meetings) passed 908 public law. It is no wonder that the voters in 2016 are looking for organizations other than playing cards and sunders. "But our political leaders do not take full responsibility for this.The media has transformed politics into bloody exercise.When we cooperate and try to compromise serious casualties have appeared. Depreciation as sold-out "or" success to the other side ". "Conflict has spurred reputation and readers, but it has created an impossible atmosphere for our elected officials - this is often our topic of climate change