Dickens' Criticism of the 1834 Poor Law in Oliver Twist

Dickens' Oliver twist criticism against the bad law in 1844 Dickens criticized the bad law of 1834 in various ways in the first five chapters. He first skillfully depicted the Victorian attitude towards the poor. He calls Oliver "Death Program" in Chapter 1. The difficulty of Oliver's birth and the fact that his mother died gave us the danger of childbirth in the Victorian society and the idea of ​​mistreatment the mother received from the surgeon.

When Dickens started the Oliver twist, he was a young man with a mission: siblings of the society like the malicious "poverty law reform law" which exposed the controversy of Oliver and the 1834 controversy to these children Exposing to the treatment of ours. . Since its birth in the studio, he was a "badge and invoice", and Oliver was the essence of Dickens' Victorian society. In fact, the author believes that by letting the reader care about such a boy, they can make them feel a lot of things. Although the story of Oliver Twist as a reality may be "wrong", it includes persistent truth and explanation such as "The funeral of the poor in Chapter 5 is historically accurate" .

Oliver's distorted novel by Oliver Dickens is a cruel criticism of children and the poor in the 19th century society. This is the first novel that Dickens wrote with his name when Dickens was 24 years old, he revealed his enthusiastic comical comment and criticism. From the outset, Dickens showed readers poor people and poor people, especially children of illegally born babies, had no effect in the beginning of the 20th century.

The first part of Oliver Twist is to challenge the church and charity organized by the church during the Dickens era. The system described by Dickens was executed in 1834 by the "Law of Poverty", which stipulated that if poor people moved to government work they would only receive government aid. Residents of these studios are basically prisoners and their rights are severely restricted by a series of stringent regulations. I need to work and my family is almost always separated and there is little distribution of food and clothing. The principle of these studio is that poverty is the result of laziness and the bad condition of the studio will encourage poor people to improve their situation. However, the economic turmoil of the industrial revolution has prevented many people from doing so, and the studio does not provide any means for social or economic improvement.