Dichotomy between Politics and Public Administration

Politics - the dichotomy of the administration basically has two partial meanings; this idea has two government functions, as the name implies, politics and administration. Discussion on politics and administrative dichotomy has been on for several years and there is no comprehensive consensus on why they differ from each other. Critically looking at the two aspects of this idea there is a way to prove the correct presentation of the officer's work and there are still some ways to prove inaccurate.

The concept of bisecting politics and administration is one of the important issues in administrative discipline. In this regard, the first remarkable appeal can often be traced back to former US president Woodrow Wilson. A classic bureaucrat in the 1887 seminar article said, "Politics and administration are two different fields, each with its own staff group." However, it seems that politics and administration have recently grown into their own fields, but we can not dilute the interconnection. Widely accepted politics, especially the classical concept, means "distribution of authoritative value", which is mainly the risk of social class called political executives.

Discussion on politics and administrative dichotomy has existed for many years. Many scholars tried to state the paper, but there is no general consensus on this topic as to why and why politics and administration should be different from each other. Critically looking at the two aspects of the discussion, people who support the two should be very different, arguing that it will ensure an efficient, effective and neutral bureaucracy. However, the extent of this distinction is not explicitly stated. Another group's argument that we believe that these two areas should not be separated is about the interrelationship between politics and administration. For them, politics and administration are complementary