Dialogue - Losing Humanity

Dialogue - Lose Humanity "Failed, is not it?" Her dark eyes turned towards him without appealing, unattractive, simply undeniable truth. David's heart was painful due to innocent loss and eventually lost hope. Sera has become a source of inspiration for years, so David was afraid of running out of his sparks, so he left nothing on her. When he saw that she was so bitter and desperate, he surprised him deeply. "Humanity, that's right.

David Bohm, a late physicist, was a major thinker about dialogue and believed that he began to lose his ability to think long ago. He believes the gradual division of the social order from the agricultural revolution has resulted in progressive division of the idea, which is characteristic of the recent 10,000 years of human civilization. Amazing thing is that Ishmael did the same view. "You can see that your agricultural revolution was not an event like a Trojan horse war and was isolated in a distant past.The farmer's work in the Neolithic era has not broken through until now, It began to be handed down to the next generation, which is the foundation of your civilization of today and is exactly the same as the foundation of the first country. "

When we try to analyze the dialogue as a human phenomenon, we will discover the essence, or words, of some dialogue itself. However, since this word is not simply a tool for enabling dialogue, we have to look for its components. In this fundamental interaction, if one is sacrificed (even to some extent) the other is immediately affected. It is a habit not to have real words at the same time. Therefore, to say the real words is to change the world.

If you say them, people change them by naming the world, and the dialogue will impose themselves as a way they understand the meaning as a human. Therefore, dialogue is a necessity of existence. Furthermore, since the dialogue is the interaction of dialogue partners, the transformation and the behavior of the world to humanization, this dialogue can not be reduced to one 's own behavior in the "existence" thinking of others and can not be discussed. A brief opinion exchange on "consumption". This is not committed to naming the world nor dedicating to pursue the truth but hostile and controversial discussions among those who are committed to impose their own truth It is not. Since dialogue is an encounter between women and men in the world, it is not the case to represent a specific name of another person. This is a creative act and it should not be a tool for one person to be dominated by another person.