Dialectical Tensions:

Comprehensive - exclusion: enthusiastic about quitting others to communicate with others (autonomy and contact)

Routine - Unique: Create unique matching identity according to social norm (predictability and novelty)

All three internal tensions are equally important through the relationship between men and women.

The dialectical tension, also known as discrepancy and discourse struggle, constitutes influence or constitutes a related opponent. There are two broad approaches in dialectic research; the first approach puts dialectical tension as a condition, the needs or objectives are placed outside of communication and managed through communication, the second approach is the element of communication Treats dialectical tension as. A system of competitive meaning and process of meaning formation

Dialectic tension is cited as discrepancy and discourse struggle in the research literature. Dialectic tension is the opposite system logically or functionally denied. For example, certainty and uncertainty can be regarded as dialectical tension. This is because it is regarded as incompatible between certainty and uncertainty. Dialectic thinking can be traced back to oriental philosophy (such as Laoji) and Western philosophy (Heraclitus, Socrates, Plato etc.), but it can be said to be prominent when detailed by Hegel and Marx in the 19th century . In interpersonal studies, the approach departed from Hegel's and Marxist views, but dialectical tension first appeared in the 1980's (Montgomery and Baxter, 1998). In particular, dialectical studies in interpersonal communication tend to make contradiction neither conscious nor materialistic production form.

In dialectical research on interpersonal interactions, two broad approaches can be identified. In the first approach, scholars consider dialectical tension as conditions, needs, or goals that exist outside of communication and are independent of communication. In this approach, communication is a response to contradiction to manage it. This communication management practice affects the subsequent state of dialectical tension in the relationship and limits subsequent interactions among parties. The communication privacy management theory of Petronio (2002) shows the first way of dialectical relationship between disclosure and privacy. Scholars who adopt the second method are best explained in the theory of relational dialectic (Baxter, 2011; Baxter & Montgomery, 1996), which conceptualizes dialectical tension as a system of competitive meaning through communication (discourse) .