Deterrence and Influence in Counterterrorism

From past experiences, the successful strategy to combat terrorism as a result of serious and deep-rooted problems is, first of all, to destroy the current threat and then make changes to reduce the likelihood of terrorism reoccurring including. At first glance, it might appear to be suppression of terrorism is a non-realistic goal, that concepts such as cooperation and attract the terrorists have the unwavering commitment by Osama bin Laden is dealing effectively You can not. Some members of the affected terrorist organization. These groups are not just one entity, but systems with various elements, many of which can be affected. Therefore, in order to maintain anti-terrorism measures over the long term, the United States has been influenced by terrorist organizations that may be included, such as domestic supporters and wealthy financial institutions, to support a better life while supporting terrorism We must develop a multifaceted strategy including strategies to exert. Threats to the molecular shadow US strategic, political war not only a military attack is also included, the terrorist danger in exposing what is to cherish, reliable in any country or organization to support the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction terrorism purposes Including offering. Maintain cooperation with other countries that are also involved in the war with terrorism. At the same time, the strategy must maintain the core values ​​of the United States, including discriminatory use of force and maintenance of proper procedures in the provision of rapid justice.

The research described in this report is sponsored by the National Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

This report is part of the RAND Monograph series. Monograph / report is a product of RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. Rand's monograph / report shows the main findings addressing the challenges facing the public sector and the private sector. They include Executive Summary, Technical Documents and Synthesis

As long as there is no change and it is perfect, copying this electronic document for personal use is permitted. It is forbidden to reproduce for commercial purposes. It is forbidden to illegally distribute RAND PDF to Web sites other than RAND. RAND PDF is protected by copyright law. Please refer to the RAND Permissions page for reprint and permission to link.

RAND Corporation is a non-profit organization that supports policy and decision-making through research and analysis. Rand's publication does not necessarily reflect the opinions of research clients and sponsors.

On behalf of the NCTV, the WODC asked Rand Europe to create a list of ways 7 to support ethical decisions on anti-terrorism measures. WODC urges RAND Europe to outline the methods available to anti-terrorism experts, but it is not recommended which method to develop or enhance in the Netherlands. Given the limited evidence on how to support ethical decision-making of anti-terrorism, Land Europe studied ways available to professionals in the field of anti-terrorism, including military, police and intelligence activities. The research team also studied the broader evidence department related to ethical decision-making, namely health care and social work.

This paper presents the results of research methodology that help terrorism experts make decisions on ethical issues. It is other public sector experience - health care, social work, policing and intelligence activities - as well as a number of countries, primarily by utilizing the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, provides a list of terrorist measures ethical decision-making method. It does not provide advice on methods developed in the Dutch context. The report introduces the field of applied ethics, clarifies the important features of ethical decision making in countering terrorism, and explains how terrorism experts can make decisions in these situations. Finally, we will explore how the methods used in other departments are applied to antiterrorism ethical decisions.