Demonstrative Communication: Face to Face Conversation

Demonstration communication is essential for face to face conversation. This type of communication includes everything except what you say. When speaking in a presentation or face-to-face conversation, the actual word that comes out of the mouth is not as important as the signal sent when the message was sent. In fact, only 7% of the information is verbal communication, the remaining 38% is tone and 55% non-verbal tips (Lee, 2010). Tone is a type of nonverbal communication that completely changes the perception of information.

When communicating in words, communicating information and information, it is called verbal communication. There are two kinds of verbal communication, written communication and verbal communication. Oral communication is done through face-to-face conversation, group discussion, consultation, interview, radio, television, telephone, memo, letter, report, memo, e-mail and so on. The definition of oral communication is as follows. Nonverbal communication is a powerful weapon encountered in face-to-face communication. Most nonverbal communication is unconscious and people do not even know that they are sending messages. Nonverbal communication is done through gestures, face expressions, eye contact, closeness of the body, touch etc. An important definition of nonverbal communication is as follows.

Demonstration communication is essential for face to face conversation. This type of communication includes everything except what you say. When speaking in a presentation or face-to-face conversation, the actual word that comes out of the mouth is not as important as the signal sent when the message was sent. In fact, only 7% of the information is verbal communication, the remaining 38% is tone and 55% non-verbal tips (Lee, 2010). - Star believes that government and political decisions affected mainly the development of post offices, telegraphs and telephones from the 19th century to the early 20th century. In some respects it is accurate, but this view is too narrow, as it forgets the influence of users (individuals and organizations) on various technology developments.