Democracy: Yesterday and Today

The term democracy is defined in many ways by many people throughout the country. This word has meant something different over the years, because the things in America have begun to change. In the past, life in those days was very different from today's lives, so people had different views on democracy. People understand that they really have voices and that they have the opportunity to vote against what they believe. The TV program "The Voice" believes that democracy is only in people who have electronic devices that have voting rights. There is no other way to let people vote.

This is totally wrong. Democracy is not defended and will not die. Democracy will die if it does not expand. The first work of society is not just to protect yesterday 's democracy - it is also a type of rigidity. It means that you can not change democracy. The first work of society is to expand and develop tomorrow's democracy. Democracy is a garden - it is not a shrine, fortress, or holy thing. You may get confused. Recently, I forgot the true meaning of democracy. "If you tell me that" Our work is to consider democracy as a garden and develop it ", you might want to know what I mean. What is the voter turnout rate? No

Democracy is at the crossroads today. Our official formal democracy is still done in the same way it is done for hundreds of years. In most cases, our society has slowly changed, but this is no longer true. In the past few decades, our world has changed rapidly, so there is no precedent in our history. Since we are living in our own era, we are faced with our own challenges. Our democracy has not kept pace with these changes. In 1917, since the traffic and communication at that time was the same as the present, it was justified to vote every four years, but today it is necessary to show that many countries have lost faith in democracy It is insufficient.

Liquid democracy is cooperation, not competition. With today's representative democracy, competition among political campaigns is dominated by luxury and unnecessary campaign spending trying to unintentionally lie to win political competitors and voters . In many cases, many candidates are trying to develop political campaigns to win the competition, not actually focusing on so-called political plans and "how to lead the country". If it is more important to ensure that voters will vote for you than the actual governance of the country, we can be sure that there are unique systematic flaws. All win and will be elected or lose everything. This is the motto of today's democracy. In liquid democracy, this typical competition is being shelved. On the contrary, delegates compete only on winning the voter's trust, but it is only achieved through ongoing efforts and proof of ability.