Therefore, if you think that young people are less likely to be caught, or if you know that there is little punishment for arrest, they are more likely to violate the law. So, as you always have the option to decide your way, you can say that the choice is huge. Today's breakthroughs in psychology and sociology proved that the behavior of children was influenced and influenced externally like family members, schools and colleagues indeed. As a result, health care workers say "They are just children," they should not be fined as they only need to recover with "illness". This is called the medical aspect of the house.
Behavior is a thing of the past. Children who exhibit sustained destructive behavior can be a violation of children and child violations may become serious, violent, or long-standing juvenile offenders. Figure 3 summarizes the behavioral relationships among the young people of the three categories of greatest concern. In more than 20 studies they reviewed, the team found an important relationship between the early crime and subsequent crimes and misconduct. Child criminals become serious, violent and prolonged offenders and are more likely to commit crimes longer than juvenile offenders (Espiritu et al., 2001; Farrington, Lambert and West, 1998; Krohn et al., 2001 ; Loeber). , 1982, 1988; Loeber and Farrington, 1998 b; Moffitt, 1993)
In the third part of the book, we will explore the various criminal interpretations which the criminalists theoretically proposed and studied in research related to these theories. These chapters are organized according to major themes across seven distinct theoretical groups. For example, a series of theories emphasizes the impact of peer groups on violations. These theories, called social learning theories, solve ways to learn illegal behaviors in the relationship of colleagues (chapter 11). Also at the beginning of this chapter we will apply these different interpretations to Rick cases and learn a comprehensive theoretical approach (Chapter 14).