Definition of Social Movement and Neil Smelser's Predictive Theory

Definition of social movement and Neil Shemer's prediction theory suggest that a satisfactory definition of social movements is not simple. In order to clarify the confusion about this problem we give definitions of collective behavior and social movements; group actions are relatively voluntary, relatively large numbers of people who often violate established social norms Is defined as the activity involved. In contrast, the social movement is an organized, relatively continuous activity with a clear purpose of achieving or preventing a specific social change.

Looking at the book of our sociology, I came to the conclusion that the original Luddite movement belongs to the category of social movement structural distortion theory developed by Neil Smelser in 1962. I think that the movement of the original Luddite is best for the movement of Smelser. Theoretical theory says, "People gather because society is concerned that they can not function as they think, and the development of social movements is based on many factors, including beliefs on the validity and induced events that trigger actions It reflects. " Learning, Masionis) The first sentence of this explanation is that the worker wishes to remove the machine when the first move occurs, so the most important thing to make it work as usual is that the original salary It is getting.

Definition: Resource mobilization theory is used to study social movements, the success of social movements is dependent on resources (time, money, skills etc) and the ability to use them. When the theory first appeared, it was a breakthrough in social movements research, as it focused on sociological variables rather than psychological variables. Social movements are no longer considered irrational, emotional, and chaotic. This is the first time to examine the influence of external social movements such as support of various organizations and governments.

The social movement as a sustainable and sustainable group experienced major changes during its existence. This feature has led some scholars to form the "life cycle" or "natural history" theory shared by all social movements. Other scholars question the value of the lifecycle method of social movements and believe that empirical research on many exercises can not support the concept of certain development stages. Smelser suggests that social movements need some determinants, but that they do not need to occur in a specific order as an alternative value-added theory. It may exist for a while without effect, but it is activated later by adding another determinant. At best, the concept of life cycle makes it possible to discover conditions that must exist when some movement moves from one stage to another.