Defense of Traditional Marriage by Ryan T. Anderson

Ryan T. Anderson discusses the legal status of the same-sex relationship in his article "Defending the traditional marriage" (2013). He believes that marriage is historically defined as socially and legally between men and women and should be defined for the benefit of society. The interpretation of Anderson's marital status is correct, but the current use means that the definition of marriage is changing society, which should be reflected in the law. The premise that Anderson advocated is not new.

Ryan T. Anderson wrote an article that is the basis of traditional marriage standards. The truth of overturning: the future of freedom of marriage and religion is a reasonable explanation of what marriage is, why it is essential to society, why it is necessary to incorporate the traditional position into law is. His most important contribution is to identify the two fundamentally conflicting couple views that are confused in the United States today. The first is a permanent and exclusive combination of men and women, which is traditional view, that is to nurture children essentially. Conversely, the marriage of competing "consent" versions does not require monogamous women, monopolies, or eternity - only deep consensus on romantic affection

On Saturday, April 5, the Anskom Association (SAS) at Stanford University held a "Distribution Value Meeting" that discussed controversy about marriage, family and media. At the conference, well-known parents of traditional marriage such as Ryan T. Anderson and Sheriff Gilgis were stated as follows. In a long discussion between protesters and members of the SAS and compassionates, the Conference expressed concern about supporting the loss of minorities. Others believe that this conference made Stanford University a "dangerous place" for members of the LGBTQ community.

It is a powerful argument written by Sheriff Gilgis, Ryan T. Anderson, Robert P. George's book "What is Marriage" to need to convince people to consider the natural laws in public plazas? . Men and women: Defense. Their way is convincing and secular, and they are totally a tradition of natural law. Dr. Moller comments as follows: "This is a wonderful discussion - it's actually an exciting performance." Of course, his admiration is accompanied by several warnings. "Reading works by natural law theorists can show a new understanding of God's glory in the marriage system, they remind us that humans are created by men and women. "But" The ultimate authority to understand and confirm these truths is not the law of nature but the Bible.