Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight

Geertz believes that the function of culture is to give meaning to the world and to facilitate understanding.

He worked in the field during the graduate's work at the University of California, Berkeley (1958 - 60)

Ten days after arrival, please hold a massive cockfight at the public square to raise funds for the new school

Instead of explaining my position in the village, Geertz and his wife lied to the local people that they were drinking tea with the couple.

"...... Small, proud cock, balance, stretching the neck, tightening the back, lifting the tail, the challenge from the outside is big, impeccable, invisible Java."

Two bets; a one-axis wager at the center between the subjects, and a series of gambs around the ring between members of the audience

"Because people in Bali are trying to make fun" deep "games with the largest center bet possible, the pitch in the game is as equal as possible and will be as good as possible and the results will be as unpredictable as possible. "

From a Utilitarian point of view, people can not participate at all because the stakes are so high.

The idea of ​​laying online via High Stakes ideas and cook should only make absurdity increase and make it more meaningful in Balinese culture.

Requesting anthropologists to understand their culture by understanding how they interpret themselves and understanding their own experiences

Geertz achieved this goal by integrating himself in culture and at another level related to the local "observer".

Throughout the article he revealed that he respects the opinions of people rather than giving conclusions and told them to tell him

The cook itself represents all evils and "animals" in Bali and is located in everyday life They remind people of their identity and their social position.

"When identifying your penis, Balinese men need to identify not only their ideal myself, even their own penis, but at the same time he is the most scary, hatred and paradoxical.

Clifford Geertz: "Deep Game: Notes on Battle Fighting Chicken" - Summary and Comment "The Note on Bali Fighting Chicken" (1972) is the culture of people starting with the conclusion. It is a collection of rituals that itself is an ensemble, and these texts are what anthropologists are trying to decipher. "Deep Game: Annotation on Bali's Cockfight" not only explains the meaning of certain cultural phenomena, the cockfight in Bali, and the interpretation of Geertz of culture as human, but Clifford Geertz's most influential One of the articles. A series of texts read by scientists. Geertz showed that Bali's cockfight as cultural text reflects at least the true meaning of Bali. Geertz reports that people in Bali are deeply fed up with the expression of behavior of animals, especially animals.

Clifford Geertz discusses the cultural significance of Bali's cockfight at his article "Deep Game: Notes on Battle Battle Chicken". Clifford believes that for Balinese people, the cockfight is a way out of emotions and emotions that are generally underestimated in Balinese culture. The way of this cockfight is to release natural human behavior for Balinese people; it is a means to express themselves in an independent way. The cook functioned basically as a symbol of the boss. The owner of the cock resolved frustration, happiness, and pain through the penis. Because certain habits that are considered barbarous in Balinese culture are ignored or accepted in struggle, Bali can maintain a purely ideal state. It is these beliefs (ignoring cockfight) to deny that Balinese people meet most of his or her inner passion. But the struggle will help solve this difficulty