When Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote "Emotional Declaration", she used the "Declaration of Independence" as a framework. It is no exaggeration to say that she is paying attention to the style and wording of the Declaration of Independence without doubt. It is well known that they are written in the same way. Thomas Jefferson wrote that "These truths are self-evident, that all people are equal." Elizabeth Kaldi Stanton, editor-in chief, said that both men and women are equal. This raises the question of what is the similarity between the problems reflected in the two documents.
In my opinion, it is difficult to find a common purpose. The fact that "emotional declaration" and "declaration of independence" is compared with the first and possibly the most similar similarity I think are in these two documents, the purpose of someone to achieve unauthorized right - life - In pursuit of freedom and happiness In each case there is a different "someone" who wants to pursue these indivisible rights for various reasons. Thomas Jefferson announced it for political reasons. Changing the historical background changed the concept and freedom of freedom. The "Declaration of Independence" was written in times when freedom meant political justice. "Freedom of meaning" was written in times when freedom means gender equality. But freedom and freedom are always free and free.
However, I have the opportunity to open an interpreter for everyone. Thus, Stanton will probably use the famous model of the Declaration of Independence to gain more power to automatically connect to this legendary document, but she uses this example for women I will. Stanton will gladly accept the women essentially required in the Declaration of Independence - pursuit of life, freedom, and happiness! As I mentioned before, she uses many of the benefits of quoting women through interpretation and reminds the government that "all men are equal." Also, women are included in this. In addition, in both documents, people are suffering due to second best conditions. The "Declaration of Independence" outlines "patient's tolerance to colonies", but the "emotional declaration" outlines "treatment of patients against women under this administration".
There are certainly similarities when summarizing this, but they are guided by different ambitions. Remember that these declarations are based on different historical backgrounds and the right to vote under different powers.
Stanton imitated the "emotional declaration" after the "founder's father's independence declaration", and in addition to this period, advocated a viewpoint including women. The beginning of "emotional declaration" is very similar to the original "declaration of independence". "I believe these truths are self-evident: All men and women are equal and they are given some disadvantage by the Creator ... ..." The first of the "emotional declaration" After the part, Stanton continued to solve the various atrocities committed by men over time, just as founder fathers explained their problems in the UK. According to Stanton, "The history of mankind is the history of repetition of human injury and robbery by women, directly opposing the establishment of absolute tyranny by women."
"Emotional Declaration" was written by a prominent women's rights activist Elizabeth Kaddy Stanton and was signed by many women who participated in the Seneca Falls Conference in 1848. "Emotional declaration" and "independence declaration" have similar background in the sense of writing. These documents were signed and found to have no right to be entitled. The "Declaration of Independence" written by Thomas Jefferson solves the problem related to British tyranny of colonies, whereas Elizabeth Cathy Stanton has been called " I write emotional declaration ". Comparative gender inequality
Both "Emotional Declaration" and "Independence Declaration" represent unfairness and power of groups of people. "Emotional declaration" is based on the "Declaration of Independence" in order to show the similarity between repression of male women and oppression of the colony of the king. In the process of the events of mankind, it is necessary for some of human beings to take a different position than the position they have occupied, rather than the laws of nature and the laws of nature. God gives them rights and respecting human opinion demands them to announce the reasons motivating them to follow such a path.