Debating the Topics Monism and Vedanta

All the things we do, experience, feel and think are all explained in a physical way. For discussions between robots and humans, Monist will say robots are silicon based lives, and humans are based on carbon oxides. This is the only difference they see as spiritual people. When both humans and robots behave in the same way and talk about "feelings", "thoughts", and "emotions", humans will understand that the mind is another name of the physical brain. The robot can convey that feeling.

The competitor Vedanta scholar La Manuya (AD 1017-1137) rejected a strong monism and backed the weak monism theory, that is why. Suppose Sankara's strong monism is correct. In other words, the only thing that exists in the universe is a single invariant undifferentiated god. The other thing I think is easy question to be deceived. As a result, worshiping God for me is meaningless. First of all, if God does not understand at all, God has no personality like a huge clay. Worshiping such things is meaningless. Second, if my true inner self is this god, then I adore myself by worshiping God. Third, every worship I do, such as prayer, sacrifice, charity, will be part of the apparent world. But the world of appearance is not true, so any worship I do is not true.

In philosophy, monisms believe that the universe consists of only one kind, and Hinduism tends to be a monism as a whole, and that mythical concept of God contains everything. Since the 8th century AD, the monism problem has been intensely discussed by a group of philosophers in the Hindu-Vedanta tradition, and these philosophers get inspired directly from Upanishad. Discussion began with the view of the scholar Sankara (788-820 CE). Philosophically, we can understand the concept of monism in two ways. First, we call weak monism, the universe consists of basic things, but that is divided into subunits. For example, Orange is a unified whole as it is an independent biological unit. Orange, on the other hand, has clear parts like pears, inside and seeds on the outside. He literally understood the unification concept of Upanishad and adopted a strong monism.