Debate on Whether Sports Should Make Full Use of the Technology Available

Discussions on whether sports should make the best use of available technology and why sports chooses not to use technology to make a lot of decisions are developing. Many false decisions lead to controversy and many team and individual failures. There are many sports utilization techniques, and many do not use technology. Most sports that use technology participate in various competitions such as cars, horseback riding, running, swimming, cycling, and all sports. I will explain sports that do not fully utilize technology.

Last night I explained to Fox Sports experts Kristine Leahy and Colin Cowherd whether e - sports (also called video game) should be involved in the 2024 Olympics. Cowherd is absolutely against the game and Leahy can not support it any more. Nerds are naturally attracted to innovation, they are creative individuals, we see things that are different from most people in society, and most people do not have any complaints at all. Otaku gave us an iPhone, a computer, they designed the coolest car in the world, and most importantly, the crack nerd unit developed an atomic bomb.

Sports technology often uses war technology is not a coincidence. Almost all of the classic game, from reload (Full Gun Battle) to tank race, throwing spear throwing, simulating several aspects of battle and fighting. The contemporary Pentaslon, which was originally thought to be the premiere of the modern Olympic Games, is designed to simulate the experience of a cavalry officer trapped behind the enemy. (Legally, until the 1950s, cavalry soldiers were considered professional athletes by French law.)

Technology and sports issues that contribute to decision making are always controversial, and where is this? Interestingly, in the case of cricket, you can say that it might strengthen sports in an unintended way. Although it was introduced for more accurate decision making, is not it mostly the creation of a theater? It is a bit, but it has the basis of truth. If you are not there, there is no theater. This is an euphoric moment waiting for the revelation of truth. Both American football and cricket have a break, so even if you have to wait another 30 seconds, it does not matter to fans. We must recognize that the experience of the stadium will not reduce the impact on broadcast audience. I think that this applies to all sports - we do not have to sit down thinking "what has happened", but need to confirm that the fans are involved in the same way as everyone else.