Darwin's Legacy

Charles Darwin was born in Shrewsbury on February 12, 1809. His father and grandfather were respected and respected doctors, and Charles grew up in a well-educated, freely thinking family. At the age of 8, the mother died and Charles and her five brothers and sisters were left with a terribly heavy father. Shortly thereafter he was sent to Shrewsbury boarding school to study Greek and Latin. Outside of the classroom, Charles collected his beetles and conducted his own chemistry experiment. And he gave him a nickname "qi" around the school.

Scientific thought was still surrounded by religious ideology, but the heritage of Darwin continues to exist. The core of his research deeply reflects the richness of the natural world. Destroying miracles that exist in perfect harmony of all living things is to regard his legacy as an injury. We should not artificially rectify the grace that nature gives to us, but we should pay attention to organic and natural fruits and vegetables to respect crops and our bodies.

The heritage of Darwin is far from exhausting in science. It was correctly celebrated in 2009. In the field of religion, it turned out to be more ambiguous. Similar positive reactions of the fundamentalist group's opposition and anger atheists led to a very disappointing prejudice of the ISSR members. There is another heritage in Darwin, but even if it is diverted, it is beneficial only if either side has doctrine. The way to express yourself in the interaction with Darwin's friends and critics is still an example. An attractive and humble attitude is a self-condemning way and he refuses to dogmatically resolve issues such as the existence of God and the existence of transcendental purposes in the universe.

In Darwin's legacy, philosopher John Dupre made interesting comments. "I ... that science asserts that we can collect enough evidence to prove that it is almost impossible to be rejected.The evolutionary thesis gained this reliability." "Almost" For, this is a somewhat faded version of the old epistemological defense. In fact, I believe that science will provide us realistic and rational knowledge. This means that not only is the recognized scientific theory correct, but there are ways to prove that it is reality. We are still used to believing that this epistemic guarantee is generalized. Indeed, in its more powerful version, induction is the way and the reason. As science is said to be inductive, this is the way - to infer specific regularity by fair observation of nature