Daniel Webster response to Jackson's bank bill July 10 1832. Reply July 11?

What does this mean? [This news] spread the control of the authority of the government to the power of the government. . . . It attracts any prejudice that could lead to misunderstanding of their own interests and any passion that might inflict them on impulsiveness. Is that ... showing more what this means?

[This news] spread the control of the authority of the government to the power of the government. . . . It attracts any prejudice that could lead to misunderstanding of their own interests and any passion that might inflict them on impulsiveness. It urges all plausible themes about national rights and state infringement against what the most countries recognize as legitimate, and all countries acquiesce with these themes. It sowed malicious species cynically in a relentless way against the government the author of which is the official head. As caused an unknown and unprecedented power claim, it caused a cry of endangered freedom. When there is nothing that threatens freedom like that unparalleled excuse, it is wary of public freedom. This is not the only one. It is clearly trying to offend poor people and wealthy people; it attacks people throughout the class with a big objective against their prejudice and resentment from other classes. This was a nationwide report, and I could not find exciting topics.

In July 1832, when the bill to update the Charter of the World Bank reached Jackson, the President announced the removal of veto rights. "Rich and rich people often put government actions under selfish aims," ​​he accused. They are seeking special interests to "lead richer, stronger, stronger" and more humble members of society correctly - farmers, mechanics, workers ... their government inequities I complain about you. "The government should deal with rich and poor people, but the banks are extremely and unnecessarily deviated from the principles of these justices." After the veto, the president said that before the old charter expires, the government I withdrew funds. It is an obvious power abuse that it is "revolutionizing" this country.

On July 10, 1832, President Andrew Jackson refused the bill for refinancing the second bank in the United States, claiming it was used by "rich nobleman" to oppress the public . The dismantlement of the bank caused the British and American world to fall into a huge depression (1836 - 1938), and the worsening of wheat harvest in Canada upstream in 1836 deteriorated it. Farmers can not repay debts. Most banks, including the Upper Bank of Canada, suspended payment (declaration of bankruptcy) before July 1837 and called for government support. Banks are supported by the government, but ordinary farmers and the poor have not received government support.

Typical example: In the face of a re-election in July 1832, President Jackson rejected a bill to re-plan the US bank. The presidential candidate against Jackson 's enemy Henry Clay has already pushed the bill through Congress. Clay thinks that the bank is endorsed by the people, but if Jackson wants to refuse, it will be a demon of death for his re-election. Jackson proposed his first action words as a successful but ongoing struggle against political elite. Jackson believes that his first cabinet dysfunction is due to elite corruption and failure and he relies on the "kitchen cabinet" of faithful supporters outside Washington as evidence of his distance from the insider in Washington He pointed out. He also expressed opposition to the Supreme Court's decision made in Worcester v. Georgia in 1832. It proves that the "people" that he represents were intended to spread all over the continent with white people.