Cutting Down the Brazilian Rainforest Is Wrong

It is not moral to cut Brazilian rain forests. In addition to sterilizing the soil and halving the land used for crop living, there are also no opportunities to find new medicines, new plants for medical use, and oil substitutes and uses I will. In addition, the existence of tropical rain forests protect us from global warming, making use of the rare and informative animals and their homes.

Forest logging is not a thing that has recently begun. In the late 1960s, Brazil began to destroy rapidly by cutting trees of the Amazon rainforest and burning trees. Since deforestation began, the area of ​​land destroyed in the Amazon is similar to that of Europe and France. In the Amazon rainforest of today, Brazil completely destroyed the damage that has happened so far, and still happens. One of the main reasons for deforestation was due to the Brazilian government planning in Brasilia in the 1960s, which led to the destruction of a large number of lands. The establishment of this city is the result of the people who live in Brasilia eventually need access to food and protection and urban dwellers will destroy more land to obtain the coveted materials and natural resources I will.

Brazil was a villain in the environment of the world when the Belgian-scale Brazilian rainforest fell once a year in the 1990s, and the Amazon jungle was an image of the problem in the green belt. Well, Amazon should be a correct image. Government data show that Amazon's deforestation rate in Brazil has declined by 70% in the past 10 years and has decreased from an average of 19,500 square kilometers (7,500 square miles) in 2005 to 5,800 square kilometers in 2013. If the customs clearance rate remains in 2005, it will add 3.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. This is equivalent to the EU's annual emissions. Brazil is now the world leader in addressing climate change.