Culture Specific versus Universal Customs and Trendencies

While certain cultures and trends are ubiquitous, other cultures and trends are culturally peculiar. The purpose of this academic paper is to explain culturally specific things, universal customs and trends, and precise heritage and heritage trends. There may be more specific from the demo being used. According to the culture of the University of Minnesota, culture is defined as a common pattern of behavior and interaction, cognitive structure and emotional understanding, and these models are wise through social methods.

People are discussing the existence of a specific personality model universally and culturally. When there are consistent factor structures in different cultures, evidence of universality is found. When different cultural groups (for example, Hawaii, Korea, or common personality patterns of Japanese culture) consistently discover unique patterns, cultural discovery of evidence of specific personality territory. Cultural adaptation of Western norms may be culturally related to a specific personality pattern. However, in terms of including personality, which of the five aspects is the most important? There are differences between different cultures. Extroversion, comfort, conscience and neurosis have acquired strong intercultural certification. However, the validity of open dimensions is relatively weak. But even if cultural equivalence is found in the cultural aspect above, there may be cross-cultural differences.

Ecology forms a culture, culture influences the development of personality. Personality diversity is universal and cultural. Several culturally specific aspects correspond to cultural syndromes such as complexity, tension, individualism, and collectivism. Many literature shows that five personality factors appear in various cultures. However, caution is needed when discussing this universality. Most studies do not include emic (Culture Specificity) characteristics, and samples that are significantly different from the Western sample culture have not been studied either.

Fons Trompenaars is another cultural framework expert in the Netherlands who created seven cultural orientations at "Chaolang Culture Wave" (1997). These seven dimensions are universalism and specialism, achievement and attribution, neutrality and emotion, determination and specificity, communism and individualism, relations between people and human and nature, and order and synchronicity. Of these seven cultural aspects, two are very familiar with the cultural aspect of Hofstede. Collectivism and individualism, and to some extent the distance of force. Communism of Tropezar