Male fashion women and anti-civilization ancient Jericho and the Roman Empire use clothing and jewelery as a form of nonverbal communication to indicate the affiliation of a particular occupation, class, gender, class, wealth and group I will. Today, these same items are used for similar communication methods. A modern society like the Taliban in Afghanistan has made this distinction in an extremely consistent manner (Taliban in Afghanistan), but other societies like the United States have proven to be more dynamic.
In the 19th century, cross fashion highlighted the modernization and the social epidemic of the French Revolution. Focus on sex, abolish separation between class and wealth. Male abandonment by JC Flugel was an event of the 19th century. "Men used this completely for women's use and abandoned the rights to all the brighter, more sophisticated and more varied decorative shapes" At the end of the 19th century "Bloomers" appeared When women wanted to obey this feature. The beginning of this big change is that men want a sense of unity and simplicity, they make their fame and power transcend beauty and become dominant in politics and society (than dominant class) is.
In the 18th century, clothes represented the authority of ordinary workers, so the arguments of cross fashion changed throughout the history. Since then, in the 19th century, clothes began to shift to express forces between men and women. In the 20th century, women looked at men's fashion to gain power and authority, but men continued to wear traditional men's clothes to maintain symbolic fame and superiority.