Cronon: Forum-The Trouble with Wilderness

Cronon, William, Samuel P. Hays, Michael P Cohen, Thomas R. Dunlap. "Forum: worries of the wilderness." Environmental history 1 (1996): 7-55

In his essay "Return to the wilderness or wrong nature", Krone knows that the wilderness that we imagine has nothing to do with nature because of the nature of the wilderness's cultural monuments believe. In a comprehensive overview of the high-level history of Western culture, especially the history and thought of the forefront of American society, Cronon is worn out for "sublime sacred grandeur" and "state-of-the-art primitive simplicity" Indicates a combination of categories. He said that we will exclude nature from our daily lives in our Western culture, so he asks for the natural environment to be regarded as natural. For the first time, we can find ways to solve our environmental dilemma only when we do not regard the wilderness as "a dual vision of human beings completely out of nature". Samuel Hayes criticized Krone's work for an overly general analysis as a cultural structure about the wilderness, but Cohen and Dunlap appreciated the provocative discussion of their detailed analysis; however 2 It is strictly admitted that the discussion of human author Croon is still at a purely abstract level. This paper and three answers (and Croon's response to these three criticisms) also show that the role of nature in our culture is difficult and controversial. Where to decide that discourse of power and natural culture intersect. [One World. Cherno]

In the past few decades, when our world ceased to be stopped, the wilderness proved to be the only independent retreat for civilization to escape. In William Kron 's "Wilderness trouble" or returning to the wrong nature, he says that the definition of the wilderness has changed fundamentally to us. Today, we define wild concepts as natural areas, probably cottages, resorts, or national parks. In his article, Cronon believes that our society is wrongly viewing the wilderness, which reminds us that this is not the case in history. He believes that our view of the wilderness is not natural. Because our interpretation for it changed from a barbaric life to a safe hideout. Our society definitely needs to protect our land from human activities. But the idea of ​​cloning is that everyone is committed suicide, the only way we can protect nature from human activities.

Second opinion against WILDERNESS: Overview of WILLIAM CRONON "WILDERNESS failure, or naturally returned wrong paper sample"

In his essay "Return to the wilderness or wrong nature", Krone knows that the wilderness that we imagine has nothing to do with nature because of the nature of the wilderness's cultural monuments believe. In a comprehensive overview of the high-level history of Western culture, especially the history and thought of the forefront of American society, Krone is a combination of "sublime sacred grande and state-of-the-art simplicity" in the overused category of wilderness Respectively. . He said that we will exclude nature from our daily lives in our Western culture, so he asks for the natural environment to be regarded as natural. For the first time we can find ways to solve the environmental dilemma only when we do not regard the wilderness as a "double vision of human beings outside nature".

"Turning back to the wilderness of the wilderness or the wrong character" Environment historian William Cronnon challenged the concept of the wilderness most American environmentalists have. Some of human beings and society, those not affected by human beings, primitive ones. He pointed out that this understanding of the wilderness is actually a cultural structure that includes a romantic fusion of ideas introduced at the forefront of American environmental discourse after the Industrial Revolution.