About the criticism of Thomas Nagel's "What is it like to be a bat" For centuries, the problem of "heart and mind" has bothered philosophers. This is because no one can fully explain how the mind works and how it relates to the body. Otherwise, there is no such intense debate about this issue. There is no one opposed to the idea that the earth rotates around the sun. Because it is an empirical fact. However, there is currently no explanation about the heart recognized as a fact.
At the undergraduate level, I am a philosophical student, and this famous article by Dr. Thomas Nagel plagues me. In "What is a bat", Nagel believes that knowing what it is is the question of what it is. Since we do not have bat experience, we certainly do not know how it feels that it is a bat. Only we can understand our experience, others can not understand
An American philosopher Thomas Nagel's paper, first published in The Philosophical Review in October 1974 and later published in Nagel's fatal newsletter, is "What kind of bat do you like to like?" (1979) Among them, Nagel believes materialism in materialism ignores the basic elements of consciousness, that is, the existence (or emotion) of certain conscious things. Daniel Dennet criticized Nagel's claim, he said. The most extensive conscious citation and influence thinking experiment ": 441
Thomas Nagel first mentioned his monumental monumental theory in his article "What is it to become a bat?" Even though Nagel knows everything we know from the third party science of the Bat sonar system, I do not yet know what it feels like to be a bat . However, others believe that qualia is caused by the same neural processes that produce bat 's mind, and will be fully understood as science develops. Frank Jackson developed his famous knowledge theory based on similar considerations. In this thought experiment called Mary's room, he asked me to think of a neuroscientist Mary who was born in a black and white room and gathered black and white television and computer monitors. All scientific data on the nature of color