Most of the criticism of democracy in the republic of Socrates is related to how he believes ideally that society should be organized. However, people who witnessed this dialogue in Athens in the 5th century will only lose the point of Socrates by considering this argument based on the way the government operates. It is because Socrates is actually discussing something more personal for his audience through the Republic and his soul. When he introduced the Republic he said.
The criticism of democracy is based on the definition of controversial democracy - its purpose, process, and result -. Democracy and "majority rule", "majority vote", free choice or election are related by representatives selected by direct participation or election from the classical era to the present a concrete result It is. Political thinkers see their criticisms of democracy from a different perspective. Many people do not necessarily oppose democracy - "rule of people" - they are expanding the definition of their people and casting doubts. In their work, they distinguish democratic principles that are effectively implemented through non-democratic procedures; democratic principles imposed through democratic procedures; and similar changes
Democratic critics try to emphasize democratic contradictions, paradoxes, and restrictions by hitting contrasts with other forms of government. They explained most modern democracy as a democratic long-term regime and a democratic aristocrat; they found a fascist moment in contemporary democracy; they are a society created by contemporary democracy We call it a new feudal society; in contrast with Nazism, anarchist capitalism, theocracy, absolute monarchy. Other historical figures related to democratic ideology critiques include Aristotle, Montesquieu, James Harrington, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Martin Heidegger, Hubert Traugard, Charles Moras, and FREE. Drichnice, Karl Schmidt, Hans-Herman Hope, Oswald Spengler, Nicholas Gomez Davila, Elazar Menachem Shach