Critical Thinking and Evidence-Based Practice

No matter what you do, one of the most important things in doing a good job is to be able to think critically about the situation. Finn (2011) defines critical thinking as "to evaluate the ability and willingness to make objective judgment, arguing based on good support reasons and evidence, not emotions and anecdotes." The difference between critically evaluating the situation and evaluating it without supporting evidence supporting your argument is that when you see something critical, you can suggest your ability to "propose an event" It is using it. Alternative explanation, consideration of research results, application of new understanding of social problems and personal problems "(Finn, 2011).

If you must use words to explain what science is, the word will be "why". The BSN course is often focused on critically thinking and evidence-based practice - they are "causes" of care. "Many studies have shown that there is no difference between the skills of ADN nurse and BSN nurse even after graduation, but within one year, BSN nurse will have higher critical thinking skills, better problem solving , Showing the development of clinical judgment The importance of skills to enhance vision at hospitals and other medical institutions is increasing. "(West Coast University: Difference between undergraduate degree and undergraduate degree in 2009)

Many nurse leaders use critical thinking skills and evidence-based practices as the most basic skills of executive practice. Tanner (2000) emphasizes that this is not a nursing process, as some people believe. Del Bueno (2005) wrote about the crisis of the lack of critical thinking in nursing practice. A new partnership with institutional staff is designed to promote ways to think like clinical learning and nurses (MacIntyre et al., 2009). Recent systematic reviews reviewed 12 studies on simulation and found that 6 of them found critical thinking skills through the use of simulation (Cant and Cooper, 2010). Critical thinking is an important part of applying evidence-based practice using research results to guide practical outcomes (Ireland, 2008).

Studies must be evaluated before they are actually used. There are many complexities and subtle differences in evaluating clinical practice evidence. Evaluating research behind evidence-based medicine requires critical thought and good clinical judgment. The result may be complicated or even contradictory. Therefore, the validity, reliability, and universality of the available research are the basis for evaluating whether the evidence can be applied in practice. To do this, the clinician must select a complex process that includes the best scientific evidence relevant to a particular patient - intuitive application of evidence. Critical thinking is necessary to evaluate the best scientific evidence for treatment and care of a particular patient