Critical Comparison of Two Articles on the Same Subject Essay

In this exercise, we exactly read and analyze two articles on the same topic and contrast them.

Length: The paper must be 2 pages with 2 to 3 times the width. Most of this article is a comparison of sources. In addition, cited work page is necessary.

A critical comparison of the same subject by two different authors may be most beneficial. This is an activity you do informally while doing your research. Like this subject, when writing a formal comparison, you need to consider the different writing styles, different readers, different writing motivations, and differences in opinions and facts. First analyze each article individually, then gradually compare articles that take into account various elements including your own articles.

1. Two articles are assigned - Please read each article more than once. [Or] You can choose to search for two articles by yourself. Only these articles are approved by the teacher and will be sent by e-mail to the teacher this weekend.

3. Divide the paper into two parts: a summary of each article and a comparison and comparison of these articles

2. Provide publication information for each article - author / article, title of the article, magazine name (book), and publication date

4. Explain why the topic is currently interested, mentioning issues that may surround article topics or articles themselves, biographical materials about the author, readers understand the relevance or appeal of articles Include useful background material. A description of the status of the article, or a reference to the intended audience of the article

Write directly and objectively in your own language. You can use NO to refer to direct statistics or specific statistics. Summarize the points with your words

2. Please refer first to the author (full name). After that, I will refer to the author with only the author's last name. If you have 2 or 3 writers, you will name all of their surnames. If you have more than 3 authors, please use the other author listed as the first author.

3. We will provide other important ideas to complete the summary. It tells the reader how the main idea is related

6. Keep some of the summary the same balance as the original part. If the author uses about 30% of the article for ideas, the idea should account for 30% of the space in the summary.

7. Choose the correct and accurate verb to show the relationship between the author and the idea. Jones thinks Jones thinks Jones thinks of Jones. Do not use fuzzy verbs that only provide a list of detached ideas. Jones kept saying, Do not write what Jones said.

Please do not judge the style and idea of ​​the writer. Please do not include your personal response to your personal work in this section.

Remember, before you begin, you need to critically read two articles and annotate similar or different areas for each article.

1. Discussions on each source should include the same points and differences between articles.

2. The following items to compare. For comparison you need to select 3 to 4 items and discuss with paper.

Compare / contrast by topic will describe each topic separately, but use the same comparison point to order descriptions of these points in the same order. As mentioned earlier, this format is also called detailed separation because it divides the comparison / contrast theme details into two different parts. For example, you can contrast and contrast the purpose and pattern used in two similar readings. In each topic comparison, we will first describe the purpose and pattern of the first reading. Next, we explain the purpose and mode with the second reading selection. These two parts will weakly link through some kind of migration.

A critical comparison of the same subject by two different authors may be most beneficial. This is an activity you do informally while doing your research. Like this subject, when writing a formal comparison, you need to consider the different writing styles, different readers, different writing motivations, and differences in opinions and facts. First analyze each article individually, then gradually compare articles that take into account various elements including your own articles.