Critical Analysis of Schulman's Article 'Gay Marriage and Marriage'

For many years marriage has been thought to be done correctly or strictly between men and women. Suppose men and women are married to heterosexual people. But what if a person wants to marry a person of the same gender? Why is this discussion so fierce among individuals? Religion is a large structural foundation, people of society are led by it. Alternatively, individuals do not understand that marriage is a unity among the two in love. Regardless of the situation, there will always be people who insist that homosexual marriages are 'wrong'. Sam Shulman believes that gay marriage is about marital duties or roles.

In this article, the main concern is a thorough analysis and discussion of gay marriage subject. In order to build this, this article explains the support and opposition for homosexual marriage. Regarding the position of gay marriage support, we will focus on respect for discrimination, equality and individual rights. - Marriage is part of society from the beginning. Many people celebrate joining men and women. We are taught about the "perfect" husband or wife, or at least the skills necessary to be regarded as "perfect" husband or wife. We are taught to love each other through sickness, poverty, and all the fights we face together. Marriage has changed over time

Strong opposition to homosexual marriage is the central theme of Louis P. Sheldon's 'unnatural' homosexual marriage. According to the author, homosexual marriage is "unnatural", contrary to the nature of marriage. At the same time, it violates America's social values ​​and its standards. In explaining his view, the author points out that according to a poll, "gay marriage" was rejected by major Americans. We think that gay marriage is incompatible both culturally and physically, especially because gay marriage lacks reproductive ability. To maintain his view, the authors claim that judges do not care about the wishes and values ​​of the majority of the community. Instead, homosexuals begin to gain more special rights from judicial tyranny in the United States.

The ultimate goal is to analyze marriage by liberating homosexuality. I have described in detail two important points that marriage and gays' rights movement pursue it. (1) Marriage is conceptually dangerous for its homosexuality, eradication from homosexuality to homosexuality and promotion of shocking movement of the community (2) Marriage is dangerous for homosexuals. Obviously, my criticism is not liberalism but gay liberalism, and it is influenced by the understanding of liberals who were born in the 1960s and 1970s. This is related to the importance of the initial homosexual movement which admits women's liberation and destruction. Gender agreement and family dissolution