Critical Analysis of an Incident

The purpose of this paper is to use reflex models to critically verify events in recent practices. This will allow me to analyze the incident, understand it and draw conclusions about my personal learning outcome. After a brief discussion of important analyzes and the significance of important events, we will review. Then the event is described and analyzed, and then I discuss the issues raised in the literature on recent events.

Reflection practices are deployed during the Critical Event Analysis (CIA). The main event may be a series of events that could cause an accident (reference) or reflection (Hanning 2001). The analysis process allows physicians to pause the situation and think about the meaning of the situation. Critical thinking can be viewed as a negative or positive experience (Price 2004). Therefore, some experts show discomfort accompanying important event analysis. And it causes anger, sorrow, melancholy, and sadness (see also Rach and Parker 1995 Vachon and LeBlanc 2011). Severe events can be regarded as helping to achieve drug error, cross-infection within a hospital, or patients achieve comfort, dignified death, and ward closure. However, not all events need to be as severe as these events.

In this task we will do a "critical event analysis" of the events that occurred during the actual placement from the portfolio. This type of analysis was originally used to analyze the pilot mission as a way to improve its performance (Flanagan, 1954), Norman et al. (1992) and Perry (1997) explain that this type of analysis is an important and effective tool for nurse training. As Benner (1984) states, they are still negative, so they analyze, reflect and learn from them, show their development as practitioners and individuals, and combine theory with practice To help experts from beginners.

This article reflects the main events that occurred during my placement. Here we outline how to integrate important event analysis into care for people with mental disorders, especially from a nursing perspective. I also point out the weaknesses and values ​​of reflections and try to analyze the provision of care with a more structured approach. Bandman and Bandman (2002) suggests that in order to analyze events, we must think critically and think about our beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and how to use words. Gamble and Brennan (2000) argues that the relationship between reflection and critical thought emphasizes that critical thinking needs to be based on reflectionistic thinking. In this article we also use Johns' reflection cycles (Pearson et al. 1996) to emphasize that risk management is a major concern and to give readers a clear understanding and analysis of the event.