Critical Analysis: "The Spirit of Democracy"

Democracy with various ideas lacks generally accepted definitions. However, it may have become a generally accepted government system, and most international communities tend to work under it. Larry Diamond (the author of "The Spirit of Democracy") agrees with this trend when questioning why democracy did not expand globally. A snowman effect occurred, but the spark of liberalism was allowed to transform into a democratic movement that gave way to the third wave of democracy.

In this paper, through critical analysis, we discuss the concept of general democracy, representative democracy and its criticism, and the outline of the origin and characteristics of participatory democracy, and then discuss the distinction between democratic participation and deliberative democracy I will try. Participatory democracy in Kerala is ultimately a discussion of PD / RD in the context of developing countries. According to William Connolly, democracy is a fundamentally controversial concept and it is impossible to reach an agreement on this concept (Barber, 1984). Differences in opinion may be annoying, but it does not detract from the value of the controversial concept.

The criticism of democracy is based on the definition of controversial democracy - its purpose, process, and result -. Democracy and "majority rule", "majority vote", free choice or election are related by representatives selected by direct participation or election from the classical era to the present a concrete result It is. Political thinkers see their criticisms of democracy from a different perspective. Many people do not necessarily oppose democracy - "rule of people" - they are expanding the definition of their people and casting doubts. In their work, they distinguish democratic principles that are effectively implemented through non-democratic procedures; democratic principles imposed through democratic procedures; and similar changes

Democratic critics try to emphasize democratic contradictions, paradoxes, and restrictions by hitting contrasts with other forms of government. They explained most modern democracy as a democratic long-term regime and a democratic aristocrat; they found a fascist moment in contemporary democracy; they are a society created by contemporary democracy We call it a new feudal society; in contrast with Nazism, anarchist capitalism, theocracy, absolute monarchy. Other historical figures related to democratic ideology critiques include Aristotle, Montesquieu, James Harrington, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Martin Heidegger, Hubert Traugard, Charles Moras, and FREE. Drichnice, Karl Schmidt, Hans-Herman Hope, Oswald Spengler, Nicholas Gomez Davila, Elazar Menachem Shach