Creation Science and Intelligent Design

There are still a lot of efforts to continue creativity in American classrooms. One strategy is to argue that evolution is religion, so it should not be taught in the classroom, or evolution is religion, of course you can teach creation in the classroom. [1]

In the 1980's, Philip Johnson began reading the scientific literature on evolution. Science was defined by finding a natural interpretation, but this is to investigate the evidence of evolution from a religious point of view in Darwin's writing at trial, and to challenge the sole rational interpretation of the origin of the species I guided it. Because of the phenomenon. His efforts to raise the credibility of this book and the subsequent creative list and to adjust it is the beginning of the "Smart Design" movement. Intelligent design assertions have evidence that life was created by "smart designers" (primarily because they are "to be designed" because the physical properties of the objects are so complex) . Supporters argue that IDs take into account not only facts obtained by naturalism but "all facts available". Opponents argue that ID is a pseudoscience as its argument can not be verified experimentally (see counterfeiting) and no new hypothesis has been proposed

Many supporters of ID movement support the need to teach at public schools. For example, Discovery Research Institute and Philip E. Johnson support the "Professor conflict" policy which requires support and opposition to evolutionary evidence, and then encourage students to evaluate evidence themselves.

Many supporters of ID cards believe that it should be taught at school, but other creationists believe that the law is not appropriate. The answer to Genesis says:

"AiG is not a lobbying organization, we are opposed to the law which forces the creation of education ... why we hope to atheist to teach creation, give distorted views Protection: Stepwise pictures of evolving sacred cows, such as pepper moths and maps of forged embryos ... "[2]

Opponents pointed out that "controversy by experts" applies only to social studies, religious or philosophical courses, as there is no scientific controversy and only political and religious controversy. Many people like Richard Dawkins compare school intelligent design education with plain teaching because the scientific consensus on these issues is the same.

In April 2010, American Religious College issued a guide on religious education at the K-12 public school in the United States, including guidance that innovative science and intelligent design should not be taught in science courses. The world view is defined (and limitedly) as a method of exploration based on observable and measurable evidence gathering specific inference principles. But these view of the world and other "guesses focusing on the origin of life" are another important and relevant form of human quest to be studied appropriately in literature and social science courses It shows. However, such studies must include various religious and philosophical views that represent the diversity of the worldview, and one must be considered more legitimate than others. "

In metaphysics, natural philosophy focuses on the concept of "creative science" and intelligent design, the concept of the universe as organic as a whole, and the definition of "supernatural world" and its physical world. Some scientists and scientists question whether exact experiments, observations, and methods of literary science themselves can fully understand physical reality or whether a larger framework is needed.