Creation: Scientifically Proven?

Evolution controversy is called the trial of the monkey on July 21, 1925. As Judith S. Baughman wrote in "Range Trial" in 1925, he said that the famous William Bryan Jennings and Clarence S. Darrow devastated the scientific and religious struggle. Professor Cordes has the same ability to evolve biologically. The result was the term of office of Tennessee State and the band was fined 100 dollars (1-3). This is a frontal conflict between two very different global values, but many people think they can not be together.

Scientific theory thinks that it is inherently religious and hence not scientific. This means that the textbooks used to teach intelligent design used the term "Nerve Creation" until the court decided that creativity was taught in school until the court changed in the next editing On the day of the verdict. Stage (July 1, 2014) What we have to do to harmonize science and religion is to abandon the concept of exclusion of the subject.

The creation of science or the creation of science is a field of Genesis, scientifically supporting the creation of stories in Genesis, refuting or reinterpreting geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archeology, history I insist. And scientific scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms. Linguistics Search Noah's Ark - According to the flood of Genesis, it is trying to find a burial ground of Noah's Ark, somewhere in the so-called "Ararat Mountain Range". There were many explorations, but some of them were false successes; this practice is widely regarded as fake science, more specifically fake archeology.

As a person with a scientific background, it is clear that some of the essence of science is wrong. Scientific thinking is coming back and forth day by day, "confirmed fact" is proved to be wrong later. This is part of the reason why I love science. The same can be said about the interpretation of history. There may be contradictions with me, and there are a few things that I can state clearly. The Bible asserts that Hittites are present and we now know that this is a true historical fact. One day, it is unlikely that the proof of the Hittite empire and the evidence of Jesus of Nazareth become a large-scale miscarry to deceive archeologists.