Courting Consciousness: The Future of Thinking Machines

"Star Trek: Next generation" exemplifies the software of the 24th century machine with tremendous function and amazing understanding. One of the machines is Android data which is the lieutence of Enterprise-D. Data demonstrates the amazing ability to include knowledge, develop procedures and analyze experiences included as needed. Using the data as a reference has become an important issue for Enterprise-D. According to the commander of Bruce Maddox, vice president of robotics at the Daystrom Institute, the data is precisely part of it. Because it is an unthinkable machine, it is just wealth.

C. Machine Consciousness: Unlike the previous two points, it can be regarded as a risk associated with the evolution of artificial intelligence, and the aspect of machine consciousness may best be described as an ethical dilemma. The idea includes the possibility of embedding human consciousness on machines that exceed "feelings, emotions, beliefs" in the "thinking" field. This is a complex topic that requires detailed research on the fusion of philosophy, cognitive science and neuroscience. "Consciousness" itself can be explained in a variety of ways by putting together many attributes such as self-recognition, causal relationship in state of mind, memory, experience. In order to bring the machine into a conscious state like a human being, it is necessary to reproduce all activities occurring at the nerve level of the human brain.

This article is a summary of the basics of my series. Almost all conscious dialogue will be aware of self, present, future, and the past. I hope that this framework provides a useful way to think about these aspects of machine terms. In the next article we will look at the specific philosophical definition, the meaning of the deep meaning and, of course, a number of machine examples in detail.

The key to Searle's consciousness analysis in the context of artificial intelligence machines is a counterargument to the discussion of strong and weak AI. A powerful Artificial Intelligence Theorist (SAT) believes that in the future human beings will forge machines that seem like human beings. For them, current technology limits this achievement. A weak AI theorist (WAT), which is almost opposite to SAT, thinks that there should be a correlation between it and consciousness if the machine performs the same function as human beings. For them, we already think our most advanced machines, so the thinking machines do not have technical obstacles.

It is impossible to say what will happen in the future, but there is one sure thing. 2017 is a good time to understand the way the machine thinks. To transcend the philosopher's abstraction in the armchair and delicately shape our roadmap and policies on artificial intelligence, we will see how machines see the details of the world - what they want, what they want, their potential Bias and failure modes Their temperament is quirky - just as we study psychology and neuroscience, understand, determine, act, and feel the way humans learn