Could Violence Have Been Avoided in India's Rebellion of 1857 and Its Partition in 1947

After seeing "freedom" in the documentary 'Story of India', I learned a lot about what India experienced as a country of the 19th century. In the meantime, India has made many changes while promoting freedom. The revolt of 1857 in 1947, independence, and division of the South Asian subcontinent all constituted the story of freedom in India. I do not think we can avoid partitioning, but violence may happen. There are several reasons for the revolt in 1857.

After three and a half years British colonial rule, the division of 1947 caused a majority of Muslim majority of Pakistan and Hindu's population-rich India and caused widespread regional violence. In "Beyond Split: Gender violence after the colony and representation in India" (Illinois University Press), Misri is exploring the various ways violence continues to echo today. "This is truly about the form of violence related to the concept of competition in the (Indian) countries," she said. "During division, one of the famous forms of violence against women is written in their breasts whether or not Hindu mobs invade Muslim women (religious information)"

This article focuses on violence against women in community riots that occurred in India in 1947. Interpretation of schizophrenia by gender helps to discuss various forms of violence against women and the symbolic meaning behind it. In addition, this article explores the concept of the state as a "mother" and the influence of the ideology it has on female citizens. In addition, this document highlights the problem of abducted women, the rehabilitation and rehabilitation programs the state took to save them, and practical ideas behind the national behavior. It can be said that the entire article understands religious / national pride in more detail and understands how women's body and sexual behavior are regulated or used in patriarchal society. Citizen or nation state shows its purity and honor through women