Could a Computer Feel Pain?

Does the computer feel pain? I define pain as a continuous and intentional optimization input to the feedback system. I will clarify and limit the definition terms for the given context. I then proved the robustness of this definition by demonstrating its compatibility with biologically acceptable intuition and philosophical views. My conclusion is that if the design of the computing device meets the definition of pain requirements, that computer can be said to be suffering.

To be human means to feel pain - the general design process is to find a point of pain. How can those who feel that there is no such distress, frustration, or similar machines can solve these same emotions to the user? You can program to recognize that something is a painful point, but the complexity of experiencing pain and frustration is a unique experience for humans. Another central role of the design is to add meaning and eliminate confusion. The meaning and purpose are the values ​​pursued by humans. Again, I think the machine can detect its meaning by reflecting its existence (I do not want to talk about it too early, but this may be someone in progress somewhere).

Many people, including philosopher Daniel Dennet, agree with the idea that the robot does not really feel pain but simply understands the pain. In his paper titled "Why can not you make a computer that makes you feel pain?" Dennet invited readers to participate in thought experiments on hurricane computer simulation. As with other simulations, this computer's job is to imitate the reality. However, as far as Dennett is concerned, in simulation it will not get wet or blown away. The purpose of the simulation is to imitate it, not to copy it. Computers may know the actual hurricane physical characteristics, but can not reproduce the actual process. Likewise, the computer can understand the pain, but can not reproduce the actual pain.

Humans are getting closer and closer to making computers that can be thought of as feeling. Although little is known about the process of the human brain, computer scientists are trying to imitate human ability to feel and understand emotions. In this article we will explore the times when computers can have emotional depth and what they mean for future computer dialogue. In experiments among people disguised as computers, the Turing test was reverse engineered to understand the role the computer plays as it masteres the human thought process. Discussed the significance of this research and pointed out the direction of future research