Cosmopolitanism: Cultural, Moral, and Political

The term "cosmopolitanism" is used to describe various important points in moral and socio-political philosophy. The ambiguous core shared by all international views is that all people should be (or should be) a citizen of a single community, regardless of their political affiliation That is to say. Different versions of cosmopolitanism can conceive this community in different ways. Some focus on political institutions, some focus on ethics or relationships, and some focus on common market or cultural expression. A particular form of cosmopolitanism is economic cosmopolitanism, centered around the world's free trade market, minimizing politics. Economic cosmopolitanism itself is not generally considered a viable option as it has a wide range of problems, such as inequality of wealth, poverty, side effects of capitalism, risk of natural environment.

Benhabib considers cosmopolitanism as a model of world politics and is sensitive to the cultural and human specificity of desire based on cross-cultural similarity, moral belief, etc. and human universality. In this sense, she distinguishes between two forms of universalism, the universalism of elite and internationalism. The universalism of the elite widely points to practice 17 We must point out here that Apia '"partial internationalism" is not systematic world politics. On the contrary, "partial internationalism" represents the attitude of thinking about politics. For Apia, part of the international approach has become an effective model to participate in politics in two concrete ways. First, it makes it possible for him to criticize the repressive structure of existing colonies and new empires, and to contemplate how these structures repress certain people and culture (with problems).

Ethical commonality of poppy flowers by Amitav Ghosh: Post Human criticism on universal human rights