Today, the media plays an even more important role in the way Americans think and believe. Media can influence the public in many different ways. Without the media it is almost impossible for a typical American citizen to be informed about today's affair. However, the information is not necessarily the purpose of the media. In fact, it is rare. Many Americans think that they can form their own opinion. But unconsciously the opinion is formed only by what is passed on to your door and the channel you are seeing.
Let the media take responsibility and let the law change. There are many major fraud and corruption incidents involving media. The media is very aware of the occurrence of corruption, but since they are supporting several political parties, they remain silent, and their master will be a few monetary from the rulers Get profit. Even if many journalists encountered some fraud or misbehavior, they remained silent but did not reveal whether it was covered by the media due to economic interests. If media officials are convicted of deliberately not convincing fraud or corruption, they must be sued and their license will be revoked.
The media is important not only to propose the facts about corruption but also to shape the public and scientific perception of corruption. In addition, the media set the basis for determining the possible political consequences of exposure to corruption scandals largely. Like the court's ruling, media sources have a clear prejudice in comparing fraudulent transactions in different countries and at different times. First, the media tends to prioritize more attractive stories, making it less noticeable but less pronounced more common corruption behavior. Secondly, and more importantly, the number of corruption reports includes not only the number of stories, but also the freedom of press, the problem of the corruption story market, the professionalism of journalism and available resources, and the various influences of the news It also depends on.
The familiar paradox of a corrupt student is that the more the media write about corruption, the more people think that their own countries and governments are corrupt. However, Russia is not the only dynamics of this familiarity. Indeed, a recent survey reveals another correlation that may frighten Kremlin's rotating doctor: citizen's expectation for corruption prevention is rising, which has brought a demand for fundamental political change . Kremlin hopes that the growing apprehension of elites will make them more obedient, but a viable alternative is to encourage seeking protection outside Putin's system. Therefore, contrary to the expectations of Kremlin, anti-corruption campaigns may weaken the loyalty of the elite and strengthen the demands of citizens seeking change. President Putin may have buried his own death seed to fix the deal that has made him powerful for more than a decade.