Correspondence is Crucial to Building Connections

Successful communication and authoritative feasibility are almost interrelated and mutually influencing each other. According to Harcourt, Krizan, and Merrier (1996), the supervisor teaches 95% of the working time, while the subordinates spend 60% of the working time for various kinds of communication. The association must have a specific vision and mission to communicate and move. If problems related to association occur, smooth processing may work and the associated title may be blocked.

Such views are held by Moore (1953) and Russell (1910 b; 1912). Of course, in order to understand such a theory, it is necessary to understand the concept of facts corresponding to the corresponding important relationships and beliefs. We are now looking at these problems. By doing so, we will leave history and present a more modern reorganization of the corresponding theory. (Please see Sullivan and Johnston (2018) for details on facts and propositions during this period.) The fact of neoclassical correspondence theory is itself substantive. Facts are generally considered to include not only relationships and universality but also at least detail and assets. Therefore, the neoclassical correspondence theory makes sense only in the context of metaphysics including these facts. Therefore, the theory of Moore and Russell's identity from the truth is not a coincidence, and metaphysical facts play a more important role in their view.

In section 44 of existence and time, Heidegger explores this relationship with the truth. The concept of traditional truth can be seen by correspondence The theory of the corresponding truth insists that there is correspondence between my thought and the way of the world This is the truth In Kant's term " Consistency and its purpose "(BAT P 207) COPR B 82 in S44 For example, I may argue that it is" raining ", but this idea / sentence is consistent with the actual way in the world , That is, if it is raining, I assert that the correspondence is wrong, in fact it is not raining actually, but then Heideger argues that what I am saying is false I want to understand this relationship with the "outside world" as an inner world. Challenge this traditional concept of truth

With regard to this objection, we should pay attention to the recently developed "multi-achievement potential" truth opinion, according to which the truth does not correspond to facts, but to pass the actual facts corresponding to a specific discourse field You can do. To achieve. And other attributes of reliability in other discourse fields including "marked" domain names. Strictly speaking, it holds an important element of the corresponding theory, but this view does not represent an objection to the corresponding theory, it should be regarded as one of its competitors (see Section 8.2 below) ).