Corporate Social Responsibility

Organizations are aware of the importance of attracting highly skilled and qualified employees, which is a necessary part of the organization's desirable competitive advantage (Greening & Turban, 2000). In the previous survey, it was assumed that the organization's CSR activities included attracting legitimate and attractive people (Bhattacharya et al., 2008).

Dispute over corporate social responsibility: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) began in 19537 and published Bowen's book "Social Responsibilities of Merchants" (Carrol, 1999). Some people thought that the focus at the time was not the company itself, but social conscience of businessmen. Some people think companies will not bear social responsibilities besides companies that have agreed with the government at company establishment.

This report explains the advantages of corporate social responsibility, important issues of corporate social responsibility, and the realization of corporate social responsibility. The purpose of this white paper is to analyze Nokia using the corporate social responsibility model and determine what Nokia's CSR strategy is like. This report is divided into four parts. Section 1 Outline of Corporate Social Responsibility, Section 2 Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility, Section 3 Nokia's Corporate Social Responsibility Model, Section 4

In this section we analyze and evaluate the definition of corporate social responsibility and explain the impact of corporate social responsibility on the definition of corporate social responsibility. First, I will explain and evaluate the definition of corporate social responsibility. Next, I will explain the definition of corporate social responsibility from the viewpoint of ethical behavior. The term corporate social responsibility has been in use since the early 1950's. Ackerman (1975) points out that companies are too concerned about financial consequences, which hinders social responses. Others said the company's sole purpose was to earn money (Friedman 1970), so they did not assume the obligation to "solve the world's problem" (Reinhardt 1999, pp. 53 ). Meanwhile, McDonald's and Prussie (1979) considers corporate social responsibility as a social obligation.