Convention and Nature

The nature of treaties and nature treaties are different. When someone speaks in a traditional sense, this can be explained in a natural way. The same can be said to those who speak in a natural way. This can be understood in a normal sense. An example of this is that Polus is traditionally about the baser, and Socrates thinks this meaning is natural. In the sense of nature, it means that greater evil means suffering, which is a painful mistake.

Millikan (1998) supports the concept of minimalist customs, assuming that the natural practice we call "natural customs" is custom. . For Milligan, the natural practice consists of patterns duplicated by precedent weights. If the pattern has a form derived from a previous entity, it has the same form in some respects, if the previous form differs in these respects, the current form is different and then the pattern is reproduced. The same applies to these aspects (1998, p. 163). Copy is a form of replication that meets these criteria; the retina mapping from the stimulation pattern of the retina to the stimulation pattern of the visual cortex is distinctly different

The distinction between natural conventions opposes social or cultural provisions (from "humanity") instinctive or "voluntary" accession. Its philosophical interest lies in its use to prove or oppose certain forms of human behavior and social organization. Since "tradition" in principle object to "nature", supporters of specific order in human affairs tried to prove "nature" by the standard, but their critics simply say that it is "traditional" I tried to clarify that. 'status. In relation to this, "custom" is not related to the nature of "animal" but to "identity" of "humanity" or is blamed for their role in suppressing our "more natural" impulses It is because it is.

There is a big difference in opinion on the relationship between sophisticated Antiphon, Critias, Callicles and Socrates' nature and tradition. My boss agrees that the treaty restricts nature, but Socrates believes that the treaty can help you develop and coordinate your essence. The two views are completely contradictory, but each view is reliable. In a passage of Anthony's lost section called 'About the truth', he discussed his views on nature and tradition. Antiphon believes that the law is only observed when others see you; if not, you can obey your own human race and will not be punished against it. However, even if the laws of nature and the laws of nature are broken, you still feel reactive, so it is not important to know who you are. He believes that if we can only rely on natural urges to live, we will be free. He raised questions about the benefits of the law and stated that the law does not interfere with criminals or criminal acts.