Considering that Sartre did not withdraw, Sartre provided persuasive answers to other ideological issues through drama media. He put two women (Inez and Estelle) and one man (Garcin) forever in the hotel room. "Hell - other people!" Because pursuing the human economy, there is no framework of torture or hot rake in hell. If you like it, it is the power of the devil. Everyone is there for a specific reason (in hell) as he killed her child and her lover and then tortured his wife Estelle as he committed suicide
No Exit is the script that best represents Jean-Paul Sartre's existential philosophy. Located in the metaphorical hell of Sartre, the point of his being constitutes a plot with no exit. Each of the three roles "no exit" provides an existential view of the life of a person who is not living in real life or who chose to accept the results of his decision. These characters provide a twisted ironic twisting relationship, showing Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist view.
Jean - Paul Sutter and William Shakespeare have been separated from thought for centuries, but they examined the meaning of existence and the influence of human behavior on his soul through drama. In Sartre's "No Exit" and Shakespeare's "Hamlet" their character is only suffering from the concept of death and the accompanying mystery. Because they are trying to accept the choice and decision of life. Pursuit of spirituality and meaning of life collides with the protagonist of the two works. Sartre and Shakespeare selected symbolic spiritual ideals through props, especially the bronze ornaments of No Exit's Hell mantelpiece, and the skull of Yorick, the form of Prince Hamlet.
French existentialist Jean - Paul Sutter and Albert Camus understand this as well. Sartre drew a life in his drama - No exit - the last line of the drama was a word of resignation, "Let's continue," so Sartre wrote an "unpleasant" presence somewhere It was. Camus also believes life is absurd. At the end of his short story "The Stranger", the coronation hero instantly found out that the universe has no meaning and that God does not give it. Even if life ends in a grave, there is no difference whether that person lives as Stalin or as a saint. Fate is ultimately irrelevant to your actions, so you can live as you want. As Dostoevsky said, "Everything is permitted if there is no eternal life." Based on this, authors such as Ian Land are absolutely right in praise of selfish virtue. I live for myself; no one thinks you are responsible!