Constitutional Republic

The Constitutional Republic between 1787 and 1791, the founder of the Constitution of the United States, established a government system that has been discussed and partly implemented for centuries, but was never pure and perfect. It is realized in design, we call it the constitution Republic. Since then designs have been imitated often, but important principles have often been overlooked with these imitations. As a result, their government can not become a true republic or a true constitution.

If you say "You are constitutional Republic ... freedom and democracy are very different", if you say "If the United States is a constitutional republic and not a liberal democracy" I think that this is not true. As far as I know, "liberal democracy" is a fairly clear term in political science, and the United States is completely hybrid like any other Western European country. Some are republics, some are not, but all have common core characteristics. Because they are based on "Constitution", "Anti-democracy", "Rule of Law", etc. that emphasize these, and come from "liberal democracy" rather than "Republicanism", these constitutional republics Of the article. Treat it together. - David Oberst, 11th August 2006, 17: 50 (UTC)

I propose to redirect the Constitution Republic and Republican Democracy into this article by redirecting and this article will be upgraded to make the necessary distinction between "Republic" and "Non - Republic". These are variants, overlaps or large subsets of a single population, all of which are thought to come from liberal democracy. None of the combined candidates suggests a distinction from liberal democracy - most texts are not related to constitutional democracy (actually from liberal democracy) So far, nothing seems to contradict the assumption that nothing of the existing article "Constitutional Republicans / Republican Democracy is the constitutional democracy of the Republic".