Considering: Speaking in Tongues, Zadie Smith

I have read about 20 times since the first publication of "Tongue" in 2009. In my opinion, Jidi Smith's essay makes her like a public intelligent person than a writer or a novelist. She holds the flag high and holds the flag high

Talking with your tongue is a wonderful job. I shook in an unexpected place. She first explores how you speak, how you are in your mouth. And when your way of speaking changes, you actually change the place you are - she believes that this is a betrayal

She insists that "healthy adaptation" is "original sin in the UK", but I think that it is a crime that is unevenly distributed. That's why I am a second-generation American-born Indian woman living in the UK, and I have to do with what Zadie Smith is talking about here. For her, this is to leave her Willsden accent, Cambridge accent. For me, this is a southern accent and an American accent

From experiencing one or more voices up to Pygmalion of George Bernardshaw, changes to Barack Obama's candidates and elections are not seamless. In fact, sometimes, she intentionally creates a seam by writing a piece of his article. The reason why she did this is to make the reader think about it - for me it's about feelings. Tragedy, then hope, and freedom

It must always be a convincing old article for those who remember the first candidacy for President Obama 's candidate candidate. President Obama is another president, and at the end of a bit longer list I have to memorize and memorize the "lesson of American history" unfortunately at school. Alternative proposal"

But for us, in this article we have explored why we want the Barack Obama (because there is much hope). You know, this is the way he speaks.

In "teaching the tongue", Zadisumis uses sound as a metaphor of culture. In doing so, she emphasized some of the problems intermittently spoken by people introduced in the new culture, the biggest problem seems to be returning to the old way of doing things - this is more It is a little tragedy. I like to point out that Smith points out that "double mentioning means shame to a singular." This is my consent. There may be various reasons for this, but it can be said that many of the people claiming to be racial are doing this because they are ashamed of their legacy for some reason. But should your race really be ashamed?

In "speaking in dialect", Zadismith first described how she changed her voice from "London's working class" to "advanced Cambridge." Zadi Smith is a bisexual British woman born between a black mother and a white father. I thought she could be a serious writer so I went to Cambridge University with a new voice, and if she said, she would be a person with words. She believes that changing her voice is a way to climb a social ladder. She believes that she can also keep two sounds, but she can not eventually. She regrets that getting Cambridge English is sacrificing losing an old way of talking. At first she was able to use that sound at the same time, her childhood voice at home, and the sound of the University of Cambridge; "It is like living twice," she said. But as time went on, her new voice became the dominant voice and she could no longer choose to use another voice.