Protection and protection of Pompei's building Pompeii of ancient Rome was buried in the volcano in AD 79. It should be enough to destroy the city with this, but the building in the city is actually protected by this remains. For thousands of years the city has been largely undisturbed and is not affected by elements or erosion. The excavations that have been done over the past several centuries have burned the streets again with people, and even if the concept looks romantic, the city will again be affected by these factors, It is a problem.
As a sport, general architectural protection, especially protection of ancient buildings, has gained momentum in the 18th and 19th centuries. This is modernism and correspondence to the corresponding architectural point of view, avoiding emotional attachment to old buildings and buildings, and contributing to the advancement and change of technology and architecture. Until then, most important ancient buildings that still exist can only survive, as they have significant cultural or religious significance or have not yet been discovered.
According to the CAHRISMA project on Zerhan Karabiber's ancient building research, protection and restoration of architectural heritage has been limited by material means so far. However, it is clear that preserving architectural heritage should include acoustic heritage, especially acoustically important space. Al-Wathiqu Billah Tuanku Mizan The Xinar Avidin Mosque, UiTM Shah Alam is a new mosque upgraded from an old building formerly known as Pusat Islam UiTM. The mosque was completely completed in 2010 and a new architectural design was adopted as a prayer for the main hall. Unlike other mosques, Tuanku Mizan Mosque has only one beautiful minaret, the space above the building is flat and there is no dome.
Storage / protection is used interchangeably and refers to architectural style. This encourages measures to protect and maintain the current state of the building or to prevent further damage or deterioration. This idea holds that the original design of the old building is itself correct. Two major supporters of protection and protection of the 19th century were art critic John Ruskin and artist William Morris. Recovery is a school of protectionism, and I believe they can improve historic buildings, sometimes can be completed using current materials, design and techniques. Thus, it is very similar to modernism architectural theory, except that it does not claim to destroy ancient architecture. One of the most enthusiastic supporters of this ideological school in the 19th century was the French architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc.