Conservation and Preservation at the Turn of the 19th Century

Protection and protection of the missing work in the early 19th century quoting the environmentalistic movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century as a picture of America at that time. I am expanding my desire while seeking nature conservation. Every member of the campaign is trying to protect nature, but there are two main schools trying to solve this problem. Among their two philosophies, they created two ways in which humans interact with the wilderness. Protectionist movements can be called Utilitarian movements and seek the maximum amount of maximum benefit in the longest.

By the beginning of the nineteenth century Western doctrines concerning the protection and protection of cultural heritage existed. These theories use a materialistic approach to protection, as is still seen in the recent secular protection doctrine. They used to pay attention to the authenticity of the legacy. British art critic John Ruskin (1819-1900) is one of the supporters of the protection movement. In his theory, he acknowledges the reliability and its deadly nature of historic buildings. According to him, when restoring a historical building it is necessary to minimize interference. He believes that historic buildings are the people who built them and the representatives of our descendants. "Ruskin claims that protection and protection, not recovery, is the right way to protect the environment built for the next generation" (Jackson, 2004: 18)

As a sport, general architectural protection, especially protection of ancient buildings, has gained momentum in the 18th and 19th centuries. This is modernism and correspondence to the corresponding architectural point of view, avoiding emotional attachment to old buildings and buildings, and contributing to the advancement and change of technology and architecture. Until then, most important ancient buildings that still exist can only survive, as they have significant cultural or religious significance or have not yet been discovered.

Storage / protection is used interchangeably and refers to architectural style. This encourages measures to protect and maintain the current state of the building or to prevent further damage or deterioration. This idea holds that the original design of the old building is itself correct. Two major supporters of protection and protection of the 19th century were art critic John Ruskin and artist William Morris. Recovery is a school of protectionism, and I believe they can improve historic buildings, sometimes can be completed using current materials, design and techniques. Thus, it is very similar to modernism architectural theory, except that it does not claim to destroy ancient architecture. One of the most enthusiastic supporters of this ideological school in the 19th century was the French architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc.