Henry Brownstein's book "Social Reality of Violent and Violent Crime", and Joel Best's work, "Random Violence" and "Liars and Statistics" have various relationships. "The social world in which we live is designed by us in the context of our own values and benefits," Bronstein says. These values and benefits are designed by the authorities as policies and procedures. The social problem starts with a typical event, after which media will pay attention to advertising that event.
Before deeply digging how to deal with violent crime, we need to make a very important distinction between "gun violence" and "violent crime". Gun violence is only a small part of violent crime. Violent crimes are often ignored through anti-gun campaigns to focus on gun violence. Personally, no matter what kind of equipment I use, I will pay more attention to the overall situation of all murder and all violent crimes. According to a survey of Mr. Obama's disease management and prevention center on small firearms, remember that the gun commits 300,000 crimes per year as a crime and is fucked 500,000 to 30 million times a year in legal self-defense Please keep it. Regarding violent crime, lawyer owner is not a problem. Even if the use of firearms is banned and the number of deaths due to firearms decreases, if the number of homicides and violent crime rise, is this a net benefit? Ultimately, violent crime in Australia occurred after the gun ban. Is Australia really safe with banned guns?
The good news (?) Is that the number of violent crimes between white and black is decreasing, but the bad news is that FBI has investigated this problem and discovered that a crime occurred Categorizing us into 4% high risk categories basically means that you may be a victim of 40% violent crime in the United States.