E. M. Foster's novel There is only two words in the inscription of Howards End. This gesture looks economic. At Howard End, critics and interpreters create many concise inscriptions and ties themes. For example, Stevenland raised the necessity of connectivity, the two "hedge side", the social norm of the everyday world, and the arc of the individual self or heaven in the sense of free movement between the two Foster world It is. The world - realization comes from the initial story ... "[1] says that each [role] needs to harmonize or connect the range of conceptual polarity revealed by the story - prose and passion continue
"Only being connected" is that the phrase most related to Foster is Howard's incomplete inscription and theme, and, if any, the liberal elite creed. In the New Republic, Adam Kirsch said that this already shows "race, class, ethical importance of bonds beyond the state, relationship between individuals", but when this text first appeared, Foss In particular, it is "the difficulty of tying our ordinary traditional personality to our aggressive sexual desire." Homosexual Foster did not understand the opposite sex a year ago when he wrote Howard End. The mechanism of sexual intercourse and the fact that he did not cause sexual behavior before turning 37 could implicitly understand our personal and political self
Foster's novel "End of Howard" uses three families to explore the lower class's competitive idealism and materialism, and the slight influence of poverty on the human soul. The conflict between the Schlegel family and the Wilcox family is a recurring theme reflecting the ideology of E. M. Forster's novel. Schlegel is idealist and intelligent, and Wilcox is more material and enthusiastic about maintaining his wealth and wealth. Wilcox is a bourgeoisie with no apology. In a world divided by ideological conflict, Foster hinted that just being connected only with making friends is not enough. Althusser's theory believes that Foster produced a complete embodiment of the conflicting ideology between reason and passion. At the end of Howard, Foster talks about the separation of two classes and two ideologies separated by a thick wall of social prejudice and misunderstanding.