Conjectures and Refutations � Karl Popper

In this choice, Popper briefly describes how he believes in the correct division of scientific theory with other types of theory. He pointed out that the general way to distinguish science from other fields is to follow the approach taken by science. It may be suggested that relying on empirical observation is a sign of science, the reason for doing that knowledge proposition through observation and experiments is regarded as science, and those that can not do these are revoked as scientific qualification . However, Popper believes that understanding this general science is inaccurate. He pointed out that many areas rely on what we call observation, but we rationally refuse to call them science. One such example is astrology; the field relies on a very wide range of observation systems, but few people think it is science

Popper discussed the partitioning problem when considering the emerging Einstein theory of relativity theory, Freud and Adrian psychology, and Marxist historical theory theory. Because there is a big difference between Einstein's theory and other theories, Popper tried to determine what this difference is. Importantly, although there are many things that he can deny the accuracy of the special theory of relativity theory, it is pointed out that none of the Marx or Marx psychology theories can be weakened Did. Popper believes this explains the differences in the arguments discussed. The special theory of relativity theory made an incredibly bold prediction, but it is easy to counterfeit and you can imagine banning many things happening, but things like Adler psychology Has not been done. In Popper's own words, "the theoretical scientific status standards are its counterfeitability, variability, or testability."

One of the reasons, in speculation and refutation, Karl Popper called time and space "There is no response to Einstein's blockade universe." Unfortunately, this does not preclude you (Ethan Siegel) and other Einstein supporters from keeping lying. The truth is that neither forward nor retreat is timely behavior. why? Just because there is no time dimension. The simple answer is that the time dimension of change is self-referencing, so the time dimension makes movement impossible. The longer answer is to assume that the temporal motion must be given by the time rate v = dt / dt, which is meaningless. That's pretty easy, is not it? In other words, objects such as spatio-temporal trajectories, geodesic lines, objects moving along lines of the world in space, time, etc. have no temporal and spatial movement. Do not stubborn relativists draw wool in your eyes in a meaningless way without explaining why there are spatiotemporal movements.

In the article "Science: Conjecture and Refutation", Karl Popper is about to explain standards that must be met in order for the theory to be considered scientific. He called this problem a boundary problem. "The theoretical scientific position standard is its tampering, variability, or testability," he said. Kuhn said he and Popper often agree between science and non science. He insists that the way he uses his conclusion is different from Popper. Kuhn said that if you want to find a boundary between science and science, Kaohn should not look for 'sharp or decisive' boundaries because science is not objective so that POPER believes it. Subjectivity