Confronting Guilt In Franz Kafka’s The Trial

In Franz Kafka's case, Joseph K was guilty; his crime was that he did not accept his own human nature. This type of crime is not obvious throughout the novel, but it is implicitly presented to the reader gradually. Over and over, he has his own doubts and various drawbacks. To deny his sin is essentially to deny his human nature. Because he and the law can proceed if he accepts only the sins inherent in human nature (and by doing so, his human nature itself).

The autobiographical Franz Kafka trial was a very intellectual writer in his era. Kafka was born in Austria - Czechoslovakia. He is mainly a writer of short stories and complex diaries, but he published a few novels. Kafka's work is interpreted as fable, autobiography, psychoanalysis, Marxism, religion, existentialism, expressionism, and naturalism. His novel has various explanations. - INTRODUCTION In 1964, White Byron de la Beceiz missed and was tried in Jackson while killing the black human rights leader Medgar Evers. Evers is a field secretary of the National Association for the progress of 37-year old colored people and Beckwith is a member of the Greenwood White Citizens Branch in Mississippi.

In the novel "judgment", Franz Kafka shows the importance of personal guilt with his main character Joseph K. Although K was arrested and summoned in the court, he was never told of his crime nor told him that he was actually guilty. The trial K experienced can be explained at two levels. The first is the literal interpretation of the criminal trial. The second level can be regarded as an internal exam which he has to experience to cope with his own anxiety. K and his trial were used to express the guilt of eternal human beings in the eyes of bureaucrats. However, the guilt of K is not important. Because Kafka is going to show his view that "innocent and criminal has finally no different execution". In Kafka's faith, the court considered all people guilty. Joseph K is a representative example of this treatment. He has never been told of his crime and he has not said any way of trial.