Conflicting Visions

Conflict vision is that people usually have a common goal. Most of us want it: the poor have a higher standard of living, greater traffic safety, less war and more world peace, greater racial harmony, more clean air and water, and more I enjoy a little sin. People have a common goal, but we often divide them into controversial factions to achieve these common goals and continue to implement various government policies. These policies are often unproductive and can often result in unintended consequences of vandalism.

The persistent struggle procrastinating in Egypt is not a visionary confrontation, but a prospect of freedom. - Defeat free will. The implicit lesson of Plato is that it is not all external, it is impossible to distinguish between appearance and reality clearly (meaning the victory of Sofism), but this essence is " Appearance ", essence and appearance Looks are very contrasting, the difference between appearance and essence must be engraved in the appearance itself. As long as the gap between appearance and appearance is unique to the exterior, in other words, the appearance is essentially the appearance of the exterior and the appearance is nothing background - it seems nothing at all .

The relationship between teacher and managerial vision is important. The vision of the administrator tends to cover the entire system and their vision is to organize the vision. The vision of teachers seems to focus mainly on personal or individual behavior of school change. However, looking closer to both, it may become clear that both educator groups focus on different aspects of the same vision. The development of shared vision is important because teachers and managers have different views.

Vision is a participatory process. We need to share vision, not personal vision. It is not possible to provide a vision for the entire community of interest. In order to carry out the process of building a commitment to the vision and consensus, it is necessary to share the ownership of the vision as broadly as possible. This vision is useful for prioritizing or prioritizing results. Vision answers the question "What do you want?" This is not just the process of predicting what will happen in the future. It must be a future need, which may be different from future predictions and possible scenarios. It is also different from "what you want to avoid". Negative vision is limited (Senge, 1990), as long as the threat persists, energy is not to create new things, but to prevent things from happening.