When considering the style of conflict management with other people, there is a tendency to use a style that is suitable for competition, either personal or occupational. Managing conflicts is a tough task for us all, but understanding our own style helps us to decide why conflicts are done in their own way. It helps to judge what the health outcome is. Every situation is different. Interpersonal conflict is very common in many relationships. This happens when two people can not meet in the middle or can not agree to the discussion.
The style of contention management is an interesting topic. It is how people usually resolve conflicts. The four types of conflict management are competition (resolved by "violence, regardless of tangible or nonphysical, attention to violence can take various forms), cooperation (Win-Win strategy), compromise (silent spiral Consideration I classified it as a somewhat avoiding person and it is an avoidance (just an evasive person), but it is interesting that the classmate used all five conflict management methods according to the situation I gave an opinion. Dispute management style will be classified as one, but the most effective way is to use all types according to the situation.
People are familiar creatures, so you can understand that you can manage conflicts in a manner familiar to team members, rather than choosing a conflict management method appropriate for a particular confrontation. Using conflict management methods that are not suitable for the environment can lead to undesirable results. Engleberg, Wynn, and Schutter discuss five typical collision management approaches in an article entitled "Collision and Unity in Groups" (2003). You have to decide the style to think about your approach. One of the most common ways suggests that individuals are more likely to use one of five inconsistent ways. Avoidance, adaptation, competition, compromise, and collaboration.