Conclusions and Controversies about the Effectiveness of School Resources

I started with some general observations and conclusions. Subsequent discussions will provide some relevant evidence and reference material to support my conclusion. As a starting point, the fact that educational investment is very important to the US economy shows that a positive human capital investment strategy is very valuable. Human capital investment is very important for the economic overall success as the US economy is built on skilled labor and makes full use of the existence of skills. In addition, in recent years many authors have shown that the productivity of labor market value measured at the school level is significantly improved. I think that this evaluation shows that the economy needs more and more skilled labor. Recent research also shows that education is very important to increase nationwide growth rate and shows a very important relationship between human capital and growth rate. Economists recently spent considerable time and energy trying to understand why some countries are growing faster than others. Most people believe that the accumulation of human capital in a country is an important part of the growth rate difference. Furthermore, we believe that education is a major factor in providing equal opportunities for all members of society as a way of reducing or breaking the relevance of income among generations. In short, these benefits provide an important and relatively obvious reason for us to continually focus on education.

These are highly controversial estimates and are backed by assumptions that are controversial about how the economy is managed and the impact of basic income on it. Most, if not most, economic modelers will reach different conclusions. Basic income hinders work and increasing taxes for paying wages can have a huge negative impact on the economy. It is difficult to predict how the economic crisis policy will change the economy, and there is need for a totally controversial argument about how the economy is currently functioning. Researchers at the Levy Institute model and the Roosevelt Institute have made some big assumptions that many macroeconomicists and fiscal economists might object to it.

Many ongoing research is increasingly involving economists, and the impact of school resources on student performance has produced inconsistent results, causing considerable controversy in policy discussion. The reason why the interpretation of various research is controversial is that the result of the research has directly influenced policy debate. Two separate research areas are being discussed widely in particular. The overall question of whether raising funds for school brings about higher achievement ("money not important" debate) has entered legislative discussions and the court's review of the school's financial system . In addition, policy discussion on reducing class size has strengthened academic research on the relationship between class size and achievement.

There are many controversies about public school education and private school education. There was much debate about the pros and cons of public schools and private schools. However, selection depends on the parents of school-age children. Many things must be considered before choosing. These aspects include two types of school system, religious background, appropriate funds, personal educational beliefs, ethnic integration, and many other effects. Some people think that public schools are not effective for teaching necessary skills to students. Part of the reason for this idea is that public schools have larger classrooms than private schools. Therefore, less communication between students and teachers. In our big public school, some children were miserable and could not learn (Chenowith T 08). However, research shows that private schools do not have adequate teacher qualifications and that they use obsolete teaching materials.